We used to identify the whole with our host, but in our particular case that was leading us towards seeing system-wide problems and system-wide abilities as headmate-specific.
berockly (TTG)
The little i do know about tulpas and relation to host comes from talking to people with DLD
Ultimately, I think someone/the host maintaining a dissociated other-worldly feeling the entire time will turn out to not work or not work well in the long run.
Well, DID can be a mess and in most of cases is connected to trauma people can't process. It's coping mechanism that might help you survive being abused but also backfire later. Alters tend to be very disconnected from each other and memory barriers are a common thing.
Tulpamancy techniques applied to DID can actually help a lot with their system management. Might improve communication and allow them to switch in a more controlled and willing way. Though there's also a chance the tulpa will behave/function more like an alter because that is the system dynamic that they are used to.
Abvieon {Alex}
Tulpamancy techniques applied to DID can actually help a lot with their system management. Might improve communication and allow them to switch in a more controlled and willing way. Though there's also a chance the tulpa will behave/function more like an alter because that is the system dynamic that they are used to.
Tulpa can develop to function more like another identity than an imaginary friend. But it's unlikely to develop to be like DID alters. Memory barriers, which tend to be most problematic thing in DID are unlikely to be formed in tulpamancy systems.
It doesn't mean you can't hurt yourself with tulpamancy at all... But I'd say that it's not a tulpamancy itself that can hurt you but delusional approach to some stuff you might acquire if you're just careless.
Deleted User
It doesn't mean you can't hurt yourself with tulpamancy at all... But I'd say that it's not a tulpamancy itself that can hurt you but delusional approach to some stuff you might acquire if you're just careless.
Tulpa can develop to function more like another identity than an imaginary friend. But it's unlikely to develop to be like DID alters. Memory barriers, which tend to be most problematic thing in DID are unlikely to be formed in tulpamancy systems.
Frankly I think it may be a mistake also to assume that everyone in DID communities has an accurate picture of how DID works. I think dealing with these things in particular the same experiences could be produced a number of different ways. To some extent it doesn't matter. But the end result experience is the more certain thing, not necessarily the mechanism(s).
You'd have to define for yourself what being mentally healthy looks like, and observe your behaviour to see if it lines up with that. They key is in observing how it actually affects your life, in order to try and avoid being biased by wanting something to be healthy.
Probably that the tulpa takes on the brain's first-person perspective. The host is still retained, doesn't so much become something else I don't think, as it does surrender the first person perspective to the tulpa.
Though I think at the core this is really just a semantic difference in describing the ultimately same experience. @Aya#6951 (Yuka)
Scarlet
Frankly I think it may be a mistake also to assume that everyone in DID communities has an accurate picture of how DID works. I think dealing with these things in particular the same experiences could be produced a number of different ways. To some extent it doesn't matter. But the end result experience is the more certain thing, not necessarily the mechanism(s).
True, DID communities bring more harm than good to mental health of their members because of that. @Deleted User can explain it the best of us I guess.